The upgrade to macOS Catalina could also prove expensive I won’t be a happy bunny if I have to switch. I know from photographer friends that I’m not alone in that assessment.
But after spending some time playing with it, and being dismayed by how much the UI had changed, I decided to stick with the classic version.
I do already have the current version of Lightroom, as I have the Photographer’s subscription for Photoshop CC, which also gets me Lightroom CC. The worst-case here is that the rather elderly plugins – or modern replacements for them – are now only available for later versions of Lightroom. The app is 64-bit, so ought to still run in Catalina, but some of my plugins are flagged by the Legacy Software checker. I’m able to whizz through photo edits in no time at all thanks to a combination of a bunch of presets I’ve created, plugins I’ve added and familiarity with the UI. The UI changes between versions 1 and 3 have been incremental, so there’s never been a big new learning curve. I’ve used Lightroom since version 1, and love the app. All are old, and the developers have long since lost interest in updating them, so I’m going to need to find suitable alternatives…Īnd yes, I’ve had plenty of notice, so could have done this by now, but they are apps I run perhaps once a month – so I haven’t prioritized them.īut a hassle more because there are ‘classic’ versions of apps I love, and which I may now have to abandon in favor of newer ones with a different user interface.
For me, the loss of 32-bit app compatibility could potentially be both a major hassle and a significant expense.Ī hassle in part because there are several small utility apps I use which are 32-bit only. If I didn’t write about Apple-related tech for a living, I’m honestly not sure whether I’d upgrade to macOS Catalina.
0 kommentar(er)
